A civil rights evaluation is a psychological assessment related to alleged civil rights violations. At Liebert Psychological Services, Dr. Sara Liebert provides expert civil rights evaluations that examine emotional harm, psychological impact, and the relationship between claimed damages and the alleged conduct.
What is a civil rights psychological evaluation?
A civil rights evaluation assesses the psychological consequences an individual reports in connection with an alleged civil rights violation. It documents the nature and severity of emotional harm and analyzes how that harm relates to the conduct at issue, providing the court with an objective, well-supported account of the psychological dimension of the claim.
When is this evaluation used?
Attorneys retain Dr. Liebert in civil rights matters where psychological harm is a central question. An objective evaluation can clarify the emotional and psychological impact claimed and provide the court with a well-reasoned opinion on causation and the extent of any impairment.
What does the evaluation assess?
The assessment evaluates emotional harm, psychological impact, and the relationship between claimed damages and the alleged conduct. Dr. Liebert integrates clinical interviews, records review, and, when appropriate, standardized measures, while considering alternative explanations for the reported symptoms.
What does the evaluation process involve?
The process typically includes a clinical interview, a review of relevant records, and, where appropriate, standardized testing. Dr. Liebert synthesizes these sources into a clear report that distinguishes documented findings from interpretation and explains the reasoning supporting each opinion.
Why choose Dr. Liebert?
As a top-rated, forensic psychologist licensed in NY, CT, and FL, and an NYU faculty member, Dr. Liebert offers credible, well-reasoned opinions that reflect a nuanced understanding of the systems in which individuals live and function.
What can a civil rights evaluation be used for?
The findings help the Court understand the psychological dimension of a civil rights claim, including the nature and severity of emotional harm and its relationship to the alleged conduct. The evaluation can clarify diagnosis, document functional impact, and address causation and prognosis. Because Dr. Liebert weighs alternative explanations and contextual factors, her opinions are well-reasoned and clearly supported, providing a sound basis for settlement discussions or testimony.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. The evaluation specifically considers the relationship between the claimed damages and the alleged conduct.
Submit an inquiry. Dr. Liebert will reply within 24 hours.